Name: Pat English
Place: Wales
Profession: Newspaper journalist, designer and trainer
Interests past and present: Words, Design, Photography, Archaeology, Anthropology, Gardening, Nature, Science Fiction, Genealogy, Rugby Union…
Probable blog post subjects: Nature, Words, Design and Nostalgia…
I always thought I wanted to be a novelist, but instead I became a journalist and had all the imagination knocked out of me, so I dream no more of creative writing.
Although I am a newspaper journalist, please don’t expect me to be topical. Mainly this blog is an outpouring of everything I have collected in my life – books, images, jottings, memories and a love of nature.
Its main value has been to focus my mind on the world around me again – something that takes me back to my childhood – and maybe even some creativity once more.
The camera that accompanied me in my explorations until May 2014 was a compact Olympus C-765 Ultra Zoom. See a review here
My Olympus C-765 Ultra Zoom camera
I loved it because it was good for landscape shots, zooming in on distant birds and closing in on flowers and insects. It wasn’t a true macro and I couldn’t always guarantee the focus would come out just right, but at least I didn’t need to keep on switching lenses.
Then in May 2014 I started using a new compact camera, a Sony Cyber-shot HX50.
Sony Cyber-shot HX50
Read more about my first outings with the Sony camera on this blog post.
My Nikon D5000
From late 2010 I have also had a Digital SLR camera, a Nikon D5000, for which I immediately bought a macro lens (see this post) and by Christmas 2010 I also had a zoom lens for it.
My lightweight Nikon micro (macro) lens
I have had some success zooming in on garden birds and using the macro for flowers and insects, but as of mid 2011 I am still not happy that I am getting the best out of the lenses in terms of focus. Back to reading the instruction manual, I guess.
My Nikon 55mm-300mm zoom lens
I continue to use a compact camera for everyday out-and-about photography but most of the pictures taken in my own garden from late 2010 are Nikon pictures.
Carrying a camera and three lenses on a trip, plus my weighty handbag? Mmmmm…
Note: Thanks to Ron’s advice, I now have a Lowepro 190 top-loading camera bag for my DSLR. Looking good for “getting out more”…
Nice blog! I shall monitor more closely. :)
Thank you for taking the time to respond to my blog – although when I found six comments at once in my mailbox I thought I had been spammed! I do hope you aren’t spam – if you are, you’ve taken a lot of trouble! Best wishes.
Nooooo. Not spam! Just verbose. :)
Your blog knocks me out. I’ve tried to link it in a few places, so others can enjoy it, too.
Dear Pat – thank you for this lovely long post! A thoroughly enjoyable way to spend time with my coffee this morning. It is too easy to become engrossed with work, daily chores, etc. and you have inspired me to get more in touch with what is around me in nature here in beautiful Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. Best wishes to you!!
Oh I’m so glad to hear that. I was just thinking this afternoon that no one would actually read right through any of my blog posts as they are so long.
Thank you for taking the trouble to comment.
I guess you have plenty of red leaves in autumn there in Canada.
Hope you enjoy the fall.
Very best wishes…
Hmm… Interesting parallels – I, too, wanted to write but had no talent (still don’t – I couldn’t write fiction if my life depended on it), and I wanted to be a journalist, too, but was pathologically shy when I was young, and didn’t get past the interview with the local paper.
Still, third time pays for all, I suppose, and I think my blog makes up for it (on good days!).
Indeed, you certainly have a way with words! :)
Aw, shucks . . .
Good Morning Pat,
I have enjoyed your site over the past few months since I discovered it. Your pictures are beautiful and you always seem to capture some very qualifyong aspects of the subject.I am sorry that I did not find your site earlier as I was looking to purchase a camera and ended up buying one, however yours appers to be even better..I have to switch lens ..ugh. Anyway just wanted to let you know my thoughts..Thanks for sharing your world with us..one of your fans..kjforce
Thank you for your kind words.
I am still finding my Olympus is the best all-round camera for everyday use. Even though I now have a Nikon digital SLR camera as well.
I have three lenses with the Nikon – ordinary, zoom and macro. And yes, it is a REAL pain having to swap all the time.
The new camera and lenses are very heavy, too, so I’m not sure if I will ever take them on a trip with me…
Best wishes
x
Hi Pat and kjforce,
If it’s image quality you’re after, it’s very hard to beat a d-SLR, and the convenience of interchangeable lenses. (Actually, for absolute quality it’s hard to beat a 35mm SLR and transparency film – but that’s an argument for another day!)
The problem is, these days, that photographers invariably start out with compacts, weighing 4-5oz, so when they graduate to a d-SLR they perceive them as heavy, but really they’re not.
Heavy is a 35mm SLR outfit – 2 to 3 times the weight of a d-SLR outfit, because the former is very likely to be a plastic-free zone, being mostly fabricated in brass and glass (lens elements). Even so, in the seventies I happily took a 35mm SLR outfit (50mm and 135mm lenses – in those days affordable zoom lenses were a bit iffy), on backpacking trips simply for the quality of the resulting images (did my own processing, too, in those days, shooting on Agfa 50ASA transparency film, mainly).
In a d-SLR outfit, about 75% of the weight is glass and a-f motors – and the battery, of course. And it’s the glass – the lens elements – that more than anything else governs image quality. You can have all the megapixels you like, they won’t compensate for a mediocre lens.
Weight, of course, can be a positive advantage, producing a steadier image as it helps damp out any camera shake, especially if it’s windy. And NEVER use the LCD screen as a viewfinder – hold it properly, use the viewfinder, and you’ll find you hardly notice the weight.
And yes, interchangeable lenses really are a massive convenience and a snip to change – and the right choice of camera bag matters here (never carry lenses in your pocket or in a handbag!).
Bayonet-fitting lenses can be swapped out in seconds, with practice, and every time you use the nifty bayonet-fitting, be thankful that the M42 screw-fitting has been consigned to history!
The best way to learn how to use a d-SLR is to buy a book based on 35mm SLRs. This will concentrate on the fundamentals of composition, exposure, focus, and zoom, without distracting you with all the digital whiz-bangery within the camera, very little of which is vital to taking good photographs (there is a tendency to shove loads of post-processing functions into the camera, but these are always better carried out on a computer).
Remember, no matter how expensive and technical your camera is, it still depends on you knowing what you’re doing – that’s why you see so many complaints about digital cameras online – clueless users. Don’t be one of them. (Not you Pat!)
Ron.
You forget one thing, Ron!
I’d be OK if all I had to lug about were a camera and three lenses, but I’m a woman and therefore have to carry a huge handbag on my travels as well…
Have a good Sunday!
x
While searching for info on leaf nail galls I photographed I came across your site. I too take many photos of flowers, insects, birds and nature in general. Yours is an interesting and lovely site which I intend to delve into as time permits.
Thank you for that. Do you have a site of your own?
Best wishes…
Heavy is a 35mm SLR outfit – 2 to 3 times the weight of a d-SLR outfit, because the former is very likely to be a plastic-free zone, being mostly fabricated in brass and glass (lens elements). Even so, in the seventies I happily took a 35mm SLR outfit (50mm and 135mm lenses – in those days affordable zoom lenses were a bit iffy), on backpacking trips simply for the quality of the resulting images (did my own processing, too, in those days, shooting on Agfa 50ASA transparency film, mainly).
+1
I think maybe I haven’t found the right bag yet! I’m working on it…
I started off with a heavy Fed4 non-SLR in the 1970s and graduated to a Ricoh 35mm SLR, for which I also had a second-hand fixed-focus 200mm lens, which made for beautifully sharp pictures when I could actually get it in the right position for the focus.
I also did my own processing in black & white when I was at university. Great fun but I never became a real expert.
Best wishes…
Actually, Pat, Guillema has posted a snippet from my post, +1 indicating agreement.
As for a bag, I find the LowePro TLZ, with an additional lens case strapped to it, very useful, easy to swap lenses, and reasonably comfy to carry. It holds the camera body with the 70-300mm zoom mounted, and the 17.5-45mm zoom in the lens case.
The old-style “gadget bag” where you can access all the contents simply by lifting the lid – is probably best for quick lens swaps. Warehouse Express have a good selection
http://www.warehouseexpress.com/shoulder-bags/b3019 and Tamrac have some nice examples of the type
http://www.warehouseexpress.com/shoulder-bags-tamrac/b3019-m244
Another reply to your “camera bag” comment, Ron – I have now bought a decent top-loading LowePro 190 bag and am very happy with it so far. It has room for everything and a bit of space for items I haven’t got yet!
Thanks for the advice…
Hello!
My daughter takes all the pictures in our house. I only take a dull old digital camera to the park on foggy or frosty mornings when walking the dog.
hang on, I’ll post some up to my facebook page.
What a lovely blog! I’ve subscribed to the RSS feed.
It overlaps with so many of my own enthusiasms – Long-tailed Tits are my favourite small birds, Dorset my favourite southern county,, I like flowers and nature generally. It is am inspiration to starting my own site or blog, but it will have to wait till I’m at least partially retired.
And I’ll need a decent DSLR to get close to the quality here – i just use phone or compact. I concentrate on video rather than stills.
I even share a particular dislike of large house spiders.
Hello Pat. I commented on Tintern Abby Stone. And now would like to say your blog is so interesting,the photo’s clear and crisp,encouraging me to do more photography. Today, your Stone diary: memories of flint captured me, as it is one of the things in archaeology I would have liked to study but I chose ancient pottery. I would like to link the Stone diary memories to my blog,how do I do this? If its o.k. with you of course.
Rita.
Thank you for your kind words – I just like to share my enthusiasms, really.
Not quite sure if you are just wanting to put a link on your blog to the stone diary post. But as long as you find a place to put it, you just embed a link to this: https://squirrelbasket.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/stone-diary-memories-of-flint/
Let me know if you get stuck!
And I would be very flattered if you did link in to it.
Best wishes :)
Hello Pat, I think your blog is just wonderful. I have bookmarked it ;-)
I am currently trying to change career as a Software Engineer and morph into a freelance Instructional Designer, before I lose the will to live completely.
In an effort to obtain work I need to create a portfolio to demonstrate my skills. I am currently creating an e-learning piece about identifying fungi and came across your wonderful image of Candle Snuff fungi. This is my first project so I’ve a long way to go… ;-)
Please could I have your permission to use your image? My e-learning piece is not for resale, just for my portfolio, and I will credit you for the use of the photograph.
Thanking you In anticipation.
Kay
I’m afraid that’s not my own picture – although it is linked to the original, which you will find here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/quimbaya/459561516/in/pool-botanypotd/
Hopefully you will have luck asking there.
Good luck for your project…
Hello Pat. I have a similar request regarding one of your images. Namely The penguin parents and their chick. You’ll find a more detailed request on your page but this seemed like a good thread to tag onto as you’ve already replied. Basically I’d like to use an image in a greeting card and wondered if there’s a charge and what the terms are if any. I am an independent by the way so don’t produce cards but hope to sell them to producers. I hope you can help me.
Thanks in advance
Gerry
I’m afraid I can’t help you on that. Again it’s not my picture but just one of those you will find all over the internet without being attributed. I don’t know who the original photographer was. You may have more luck looking at a similar picture on Wikipedia, here.
Thank you :-)
Thanks for your help x
I’d like to nominate you for the Sunshine Award in recognition of how much I enjoy your blog — especially the etymology entries! http://wp.me/pKuUa-1kJ
Thank you for that! But give me time to acknowledge it on my blog. It’s hard to find 10 more blogs that aren’t “award free”!
Happy Holiday – or as we say here, Merry Christmas!
Dear Pat do you know who painted The Frosty Sheep Christmas card from last year. I have just started my cards and reminder it with fondness. I think it is one of the best.
I so wish I did know! I keep all my cards for a year, so I just looked at this one again – and as I had thought, Cancer Research UK don’t say on the card who painted Fergus the Frosty Sheep.
It’s a shame, as it is indeed a lovely image and I would like to give credit where it’s due.
All the best :)
Thank you for your help. I have also contacted cancer research direct to see if they know the artist. If I find out I will let you know. Definitely one of the best charity card. 😊
Yes, please do let me know :)
Had a reply from cancer research and their supplier of cards, don’t keep information of where they get the pictures from. So its a blank. Shame as I would love to have had it hanging on my wall. Thank you Pat. Regards Ruth
Sounds a bit sloppy! Surely it must be someone’s copyright?
Thanks for trying :)